References

NO.REFERENCESJOURNALS
1Aalbers MB (2013) Neoliberalism is dead … long live neoliberalism! International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37(3): 1083–1090.Planning Theory
2Abowd, J. M., Stephens, B. E., Vilhuber, L., Andersson, F., McKinney, K. L., Roemer, M., & Woodcock, S. (2009). The LEHD infrastructure files and the creation of the quarterly workforce indicators: Producer dynamics: New evidence from micro data. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/chapters/c0485.pdfEconomic Development Quarterly
3Acker FW (1991) Performance zoning. Notre Dame Law Review 67: 363–401.Planning Theory
4Adair A, Berry J, McGreal S, et al. (2003) Urban regeneration and property investment performance. Journal of Property Research 20(4): 371–386.Planning Theory
5Adams D and Tiesdell S (2010) Planners as market actors: Rethinking state-market relations in land and property. Planning Theory & Practice 11(2): 187–207.Planning Theory
6Adams, C. (2003). The Meds and Eds in urban economic development. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25, 571-588. Aliprantis, D., Fee, K., & Oliver, N. (2014). Which poor neighborhoods experienced income growth in recent decades? Cleveland, OH: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.Economic Development Quarterly
7Adamson WL (1980) Hegemony and Revolution: A Study of Antonio Gramsci’s Political and Cultural Theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Planning Theory
8Alexander E (2001) Why planning vs. markets is an oxymoron: Asking right the question. Planning & Markets 4(1): 1–6.Planning Theory
9Alexander E (2012a) Introduction. Progress in Planning 77(2): 38–45.Planning Theory
10Alexander E (2012b) Toward a dialectic theory of planning: Nomocracy vs. teleocracy – A synthesis. Progress in Planning 77(2): 72–83.Planning Theory
11Alexander ER, Mazza L and Moroni S (2012) Planning without plans? Nomocracy or teleocracy for social-spatial ordering. Progress in Planning 77(2): 37–87. Allmendinger P (2002) Towards a post-positivist typology of planning theory. Planning Theory 1(1): 77–99.Planning Theory
12Alfasi N and Portugali J (2007) Planning rules for a self-planned city. Planning Theory 6(2): 164–182.Planning Theory
13Alfasi N, Almagor J and Benenson I (2012) The actual impact of comprehensive land-use plans. Land Use Policy 29(4): 862–877.Planning Theory
14Allmendinger P and Haughton G (2009) Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A 41(3): 617–633.Planning Theory
15Andersson DE (ed.) (2012) The Spatial Market Process. Bingley: Emerald.Planning Theory
16Andersson R and Musterd S (2005) Area-based policies: A critical appraisal. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 96(4): 377–389.Planning Theory
17Andersson, F., Haltiwanger, J. C., Kutzbach, M. J., Pollakowski, H. O., & Weinberg, D. H. (2014, April). Job displacement and the duration of joblessness: The role of spatial mismatch. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies.Economic Development Quarterly
18Andres L (2013) Differential spaces, power hierarchy and collaborative planning: A critique of the role of temporary uses in shaping and making places. Urban Studies 50(4): 759–775.Planning Theory
19Arendt H (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Planning Theory
20Atkinson R and Blandy S (2005) Introduction: International perspectives on the new enclavism and the rise of gated communities. Housing Studies 20(2): 177–186.Planning Theory
21Audi R (1996) ( ed.) The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Planning Theory
22Babson College. (2014). Stimulating small business growth: Progress report on Goldman Sachs 10,000 Small Businesses. Wellesley, MA: Author.Economic Development Quarterly
23Baeten G (2012a) Neoliberal planning: Does it really exist? In: Tasan-Kok T and Baeten G (eds) Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning. Berlin: Springer, 205–211.Planning Theory
24Baeten G (2012b) Normalising neoliberal planning: The case of Malmö, Sweden. In: Tasan-Kok T and Baeten G (eds) Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning. Berlin: Springer, 21–42.Planning Theory
25Bagwell, S. (2008). Creative clusters and city growth. Creative Industries Journal, 1, 31-46.Economic Development Quarterly
26Baker DC, Sipe NG and Gleeson BJ (2006) Performance-based planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25: 396–409.Planning Theory
27Balducci A (2011) Strategic planning as exploration. Town Planning Review 82(5): 529–546. Balducci A, Boelens L, Hillier J, et al. (2011) Introduction: Strategic spatial planning in uncertainty: Theory and exploratory practice. Town Planning Review 82(5): 481–501.Planning Theory
28Baptista I (2013) The travels of critiques of neoliberalism: Urban experiences from the ‘borderlands’. Urban Geography 34(5): 590–611.Planning Theory
29Barnett C (2005) The consolations of ‘neoliberalism’. Geoforum 36(1): 7–12.Planning Theory
30Bastow S, Dunleavy P and Tinkler J (2014) Impact of the Social Sciences, How Academics and Their Research Make a Difference. London: SAGE.Planning Theory
31Bates, T. (1997a). Financing small business creation: The case of Chinese and Korean immigrant entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 109-124.Economic Development Quarterly
32Bates, T. (1997b). Response: Michael Porter’s conservative urban agenda will not revitalize America’s inner cities: What will? Economic Development Quarterly, 11, 39-44. doi:10.1177/089124249701100104Economic Development Quarterly
33Bates, T. (2011). Minority entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 7(3-4), 151-311.Economic Development Quarterly
34Batty M (2005) Cities and Complexity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Planning Theory
35Batty M and Longley P (1994) Fractal Cities. London: Academic Press.Planning Theory
36Batty M and Marshall S (2012) The origins of complexity theories in cities and planning. In: Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, et al. (eds) Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age. Berlin: Springer, 21–45.Planning Theory
37Béal V (2012) Urban governance, sustainability and environmental movements: Post-democracy in French and British cities. European Urban and Regional Studies 19(4): 404–419.Planning Theory
38Beiner R (1983) Political Judgment. London: Methuen.Planning Theory
39Bernstein R (1983) Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics and Praxis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Planning Theory
40Bevir M (2013) A Theory of Governance. Berkeley: University of California Press.Planning Theory
41Bivand, R. (2015). Spatial dependence: Weighting schemes, statistics and models. R package (spdep; Version 0.5-81) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project. org/package=spdepEconomic Development Quarterly
42Blackler F (1995) Knowledge, Knowledge work and organisation: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies 16(6): 1021–1046.Planning Theory
43Blakely E and Snyder M (1997) Fortress America Gated Communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Planning Theory
44Blokland-Potters T (1998) Wat stadsbewoners bindt: Sociale relaties in een achterstandswijk. Kampen: Kok Agora.Planning Theory
45Boelens L (2006) Beyond the plan: Towards a new kind of planning. disP 42(167): 25–40.Planning Theory
46Boelens L (2010) Theorizing Practice and Practising Theory: Outlines for an Actor-Relational- Approach in Planning. Planning Theory 9(1): 28–62.Planning Theory
47Boelens L, Spit T and Wissink B (eds) (2006) Planning zonder overheid: Een toekomst voor planning. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.Planning Theory
48Bohman J and Rehg W (eds) (1997) Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Planning Theory
49Borret K (2001) On domains: The public, the private and the collective. Oase 54: 50–61.Planning Theory
50Boston Consulting Group, & Initiative for a Competitive Inner City. (1998). The business case for pursuing retail opportunities in the inner city. Boston, MA: Author. Boston, MA: Initiative for a Competitive Inner City & JP Morgan Chase.Economic Development Quarterly
51Branch M (1981) Continuous City Planning. New York: Wiley.Planning Theory
52Brenner N and Theodore N (2002) Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode 34(3): 349–379.Planning Theory
53Brownill S (2013) Just add water. In: Leary ME and McCarthy J (eds) The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration. London: Routledge, 45–55.Planning Theory
54Buchanan J (1965) An economic theory of clubs. Economica 32: 1–14.Planning Theory
55Bunce S and Desfor G (2007) Introduction to ‘Political ecologies of urban waterfront transformations’. Cities 24(4): 251–258.Planning Theory
56Busso, M., Gregory, J., & Kline, P. M. (2010). Assessing the incidence and efficiency of a prominent place based policy. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Chapple, K. (2006). Overcoming mismatch: Beyond dispersal, mobility, and development strategies. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(3), 322-336. doi:10.1080/01944360608976754Economic Development Quarterly
57Buunk W (2006) Ruimte voor spontane orde. S&RO 87(5): 39–43.Planning Theory
58Byrne D (2003) Complexity theory and planning theory: A necessary encounter. Planning Theory 2(3): 171–178.Planning Theory
59Cabinet Office (1999) Professional Policy Making for the 21st Century. London: Cabinet Office.Planning Theory
60Cahill D (2007) The contours of neoliberal hegemony in Australia. Rethinking Marxism 19(2): 221–233.Planning Theory
61Caldwell B (2001) Hayek: Right for the wrong reasons? Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23(2): 141–151.Planning Theory
62Caldwell B (2004) Hayek’s Challenge. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Planning Theory
63Callinicos A (2012) Contradictions of austerity. Cambridge Journal of Economics 36(1): 65–77.Planning Theory
64Campbell H (2006) Just planning: The art of situated ethical judgment. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26(1): 92–106.Planning Theory
65Campbell H (2012) Planning to change the world: Between knowledge and action lies synthesis. Journal of Planning Education and Research 32(2): 133–134.Planning Theory
66Campbell H (2012) Planning to change the world: Between knowledge and action lies synthesis. Journal of Planning Education and Research 32(2): 135–146.Planning Theory
67Cappel AJ (2002) A walk along Willow: Patterns of land use coordination in pre-zoning New Haven. In: Ellickson RC, Rose CM and Ackerman BA (eds) Perspectives on Property Law. New York: Aspen, 437–452.Planning Theory
68Carnap R (1966) Philosophical Foundations of Physics. New York: Basic Books.Planning Theory
69Cervero R and Duncan M (2004) Neighbourhood composition and residential land prices: Does exclusion raise or lower values? Urban Studies 41(2): 299–315.Planning Theory
70Charlesworth E (2006) Architects Without Frontiers: War, Reconstruction, and Design Responsibility. Oxford: Architectural Press.Planning Theory
71Charmes E (2009) On the residential “clubbisation” of French periurban municipalities. Urban Studies 46(1): 189–212.Planning Theory
72Charmes E (2010) Cul-de-sacs, superblocks and environmental areas as supports of residential territorialization. Journal of Urban Design 15(3): 357–374.Planning Theory
73Chorus P (2012) Station Area Developments in Tokyo: And What the Randstad Can Learn from It. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Planning Theory
74Claessens B (2007) Gated communities. What’s in a name? Ruimte en Planning 27(1): 28–49. Cohen J and Arato A (1992) Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Planning Theory
75Clark, J. (2013). Working regions: Reconnecting innovation and production in the knowledge economy. New York, NY: Routledge.Economic Development Quarterly
76Clausen S (2010) Løpet kjørt på Nedre Elvehavn – eller et eksempel til etterfølgelse? Adresseavisen, 16 January, 49.Planning Theory
77Clayes ER (2004) Euclid lives? Fordham Law Review 73(2): 731–770.Planning Theory
78Clegg SR, da Cunha JV, Pina e and Cunha M (2002) Management paradoxes: A relational view. Human Relations 55(5): 483–503.Planning Theory
79Cleveland Foundation. (2013). Cleveland’s Greater University Circle Initiative: A partnership between philanthropy, anchor institutions and the public sector. Cleveland, OH: Author.Economic Development Quarterly
80Coglianese C and Kagan R (2007) Regulation and Regulatory Processes. Aldershot: Ashgate.Planning Theory
81Collier SJ (2012) Neoliberalism as big Leviathan, or …? A response to Wacquant and Hilgers. Social Anthropology 20(2): 186–195.Planning Theory
82Cook IR and Ward K (2012) Relational comparisons: The assembling of Cleveland’s waterfront plan. Urban Geography 33(6): 774–795.Planning Theory
83Cooke, P., & Eriksson, A. (2011). White spaces innovation in Sweden (Report VR 2011:10). Stockholm, Sweden: Vinnova.Economic Development Quarterly
84Cooper D (1999) Epistemology: The Classic Readings. London: Blackwell.Planning Theory
85Cortright, J., & Mahmoudi, D. (2014). Neighborhood change, 1970 to 2010: Transition and growth in urban high poverty neighborhoods. Portland, OR: Impresa Economics. Retrieved from http://dillonm.io/articles/Cortright_Mahmoudi_2014_ Neighborhood-Change.pdfEconomic Development Quarterly
86Coyle, D. M., Jr. (2007). Realizing the inner city retail opportunity: Progress and new directions. Economic Development Journal, 6(1), 6-14.Economic Development Quarterly
87Crawford M (1999) Introduction. In: Chase J, Crawford M and Kaliski J (eds) Everyday Urbanism. New York: The Monacelli Press, 8–15.Planning Theory
88Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. Retrieved from http://www.necsi. edu/events/iccs6/papers/c1602a3c126ba822d0bc4293371c.pdfEconomic Development Quarterly
89Cséfalvay Z and Webster Ch (2012) Gates or no gates? A cross-European enquiry into the driving forces behind gated communities. Regional Studies 46(3): 293–308.Planning Theory
90Cuhls K (2003) From forecasting to foresight processes. Journal of Forecasting 22(2–3): 93–111.Planning Theory
91Curran, W. (2004). Gentrification and the nature of work: Exploring the links in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. Environment and Planning A, 36, 1243-1258. doi:10.1068/a36240Economic Development Quarterly
92Curran, W. (2007). “From the frying pan to the oven”: Gentrification and the experience of industrial displacement in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. Urban Studies, 44, 1427-1440. doi:10.1080/00420980701373438Economic Development Quarterly
93Dastrup, S., Ellen, I., Jefferson, A., Weselcouch, M., Schwartz, D., & Cuenca, K. (2015, May). The effects of neighborhood change on New York City Housing Authority residents. New York: NYC Center for Economic Opportunity, Abt Associates, & The NYU Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy.Economic Development Quarterly
94Davies HTO, Nutley SM and Smith PC (1999) Editorial: What works? The role of evidence in public sector policy and practice. Public Money & Management 19(1): 3–5.Planning Theory
95Davoudi S (2006) Evidence-based planning: Rhetoric and reality. disP: The Planning Review 165(2): 14–25.Planning Theory
96Davoudi S (2012) The legacy of positivism and the emergence of interpretive tradition in spatial planning. Regional Studies 46(4): 429–441.Planning Theory
97Davoudi S (2015) Research impact: Should the sky be the limit? In: Silva E, Healey P, Harris N, et al. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Research Methods. London: Routledge, 405–413.Planning Theory
98Davoudi S, Crawford J and Dilley L (2014) Energy consumption behaviour, rational or habitual? disP: The Planning Review 50(3): 11–19.Planning Theory
99Davoudi S, Harper G, Petts J, et al. (2015) Judging research quality to support evidence-informed environmental policy. Environmental Evidence 4: 9.Planning Theory
100Davy B (2008) Plan it without a condom! Planning Theory 7(3): 301–317. disP (2006) Special issue: Evidence-based planning. disP: The Planning Review 165(2): 3–72.Planning Theory
101De Bois P (2010) Stedelijke vitaliteit: fatum of fortuna? In: de Bois P (ed.) Stedelijke vitaliteit. Amsterdam: Hogeschool van Amsterdam and Elba Media, 15–45.Planning Theory
102De Cauter L (2004) The Capsular Civilization. On the City in the Age of Fear. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.Planning Theory
103De Roo G, Hillier J and van Wezemael J (2012) Complexity and Planning. Farnham: Ashgate.Planning Theory
104De Roo G, Hillier J and Van Wezemael J (eds) (2012) Complexity and Planning. Farnham: Ashgate.Planning Theory
105Delgado, M., & Zeuli, K. (2016). Clusters and regional performance: Implications for inner cities. Economic Development Quarterly, 30(2), 117-136.Economic Development Quarterly
106Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2015). Defining clusters of related industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(1), 1-38.Economic Development Quarterly
107Dembski S (2013) Case study Amsterdam Buiksloterham, the Netherlands: The challenge of planning organic transformation. CONTEXT Report 2. Amsterdam: AISSR Programme Group, Urban Planning.Planning Theory
108Dendrinos DS and Sonis M (1990) Chaos and Socio-Spatial Dynamics. Berlin: Springer.Planning Theory
109Desfor G and Jørgensen J (2004) Flexible urban governance. The case of Copenhagen’s recent waterfront development. European Planning Studies 12(4): 479–496.Planning Theory
110DiGaetano A and Klemanski JS (1999) Power and City Governance: Comparative Perspectives on Urban Development. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Planning Theory
111Ding, L., Hwang, J., & Divringi, E. (2015). Gentrification and residential mobility in Philadelphia. Philadelphia, PA: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.Economic Development Quarterly
112diZerega G (2008) New directions in emergent order research. Studies in Emergent Order 1: 1–23.Planning Theory
113Dreyfus HL and Rabinow P (1983) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Planning Theory
114Du Gay P, Millo Y and Tuck P (2012) Making government liquid: Shifts in governance using financialisation as a political device. Environment and Planning C 30(6): 1083–1099.Planning Theory
115Earth Charter Commission (2000) The Earth Charter. Available at: http://www.earthcharterinaction. org/invent/images/uploads/echarter_english.pdf (accessed 27 October 2012).Planning Theory
116Ehrenhalt, A. (2012). The great inversion and the future of the American city. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Economic Development Quarterly
117Ellin N (2006) Integral Urbanism. New York: Routledge.Planning Theory
118Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.Economic Development Quarterly
119Fainstein N and Fainstein SS (2013) Restoring just outcomes to planning concerns. In: Carmon N and Fainstein SS (eds) Policy, Planning and People: Promoting Justice in Urban Development. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 32–53.Planning Theory
120Fainstein SS (1994) The City Builders: Property, Politics, and Planning in London and New York. Oxford: Blackwell.Planning Theory
121Fainstein SS (2008) Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32(4): 768–785.Planning Theory
122Falleth E and Saglie I-L (2011) Democracy or efficiency: Contradictory national guidelines in urban planning in Norway. Urban Research and Practice 4(1): 58–71.Planning Theory
123Faludi A (1986) Critical Rationalism and Planning Methodology. London: Pion.Planning Theory
124Farhat R (2014) Progressive planning, biased discourse, and critique: An agentic perspective. Planning Theory 13(1): 82–98.Planning Theory
125Fay B (1996) Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science, A Multicultural Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Planning Theory
126Fedeli V (2012) Planning in Italy, seventy years after the first national planning law. disP 48(2): 106–113.Planning Theory
127Fee, K., & Hartley, D. (2011). Urban growth and decline: The role of population density at the city core. Retrieved from https://www.clevelandfed.org/newsroom-and-events/publications/ economic-commentary/2011-economic-commentaries/ ec-201127-urban-growth-and-decline-the-role-of-populationdensity- at-the-city-core.aspxEconomic Development Quarterly
128Feindt PH (2010) The great recession—A transformative moment for planning. International Planning Studies 15(3): 169–174.Planning Theory
129Feiock RC (2004) Politics, institutions and local land-use regulation. Urban Studies 41(2): 363– 375.Planning Theory
130Fischer F (2000) Citizens, Experts and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. New York: Taylor & Francis.Planning Theory
131Fischler R (1995) Strategy and history in professional planning, planning as world making. In: Liggett H and Perry D (eds) Spatial Practices. London: SAGE, pp. 13–59.Planning Theory
132Fitjar, R., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2011). When local interaction does not suffice: Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway. Environment and Planning A, 43, 1248-1267.Economic Development Quarterly
133Florida, R. (2003). Cities and the creative class. City & Community, 2, 3-19. doi:10.1111/1540-6040.00034Economic Development Quarterly
134Florida, R. L. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.Economic Development Quarterly
135Flynn T (1994) Foucault’s mapping of history. In: Gutting G (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 28–47.Planning Theory
136Flyvbjerg B (1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Planning Theory
137Flyvbjerg B (2001) Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Planning Theory
138Flyvbjerg B, Bruzelius N and Rothengatter W (2003) Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Planning Theory
139Foldvary F (2006) The economic case for private residential government. In: Glasze G, Webster C and Frantz K (eds) Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives. London: Routledge, 31–44.Planning Theory
140Forester J (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner; Encouraging Participative Planning Processes. London: MIT PressPlanning Theory
141Forester J (2012) On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations. Planning Theory 12(1): 5–22.Planning Theory
142Foucault M (1978) The History of Sexuality, Volume I: An Introduction (trans. R Hurtley). New York: Pantheon Books.Planning Theory
143Foucault M (1980a) l’ Impossible Prison [The Impossible Prison]. Manuscript of a roundtable discussion, 20 May 1978 (ed M Perrot), Paris: Le Seuil.Planning Theory
144Foucault M (1980b) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writing, 1972-1977 (ed C Gordon). New York: Pantheon.Planning Theory
145Foucault M (1982) The subject and power. In: Dreyfus HL and Rabinow P (eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 208–226.Planning Theory
146Foucault M (1991) Questions of method. In: Burchell G, Gordon C and Miller P (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmental Rationality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 73–86.Planning Theory
147Foucault M and Deleuze G (1990) Intellectuals and power. In: Ferguson R, Olander W, Tucker M, et al. (eds) Discourses: Conversations in Postmodern Art and Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press, 9–16.Planning Theory
148Freeman R (2007) Epistemological bricolage: How practitioners make sense of learning. Administration and Society 39(4): 476–496.Planning Theory
149Freeman, L. (2005). Displacement or succession? Urban Affairs Review, 40, 463-491. doi:10.1177/1078087404273341 Galster, G. C., & Killen, S. P. (1995). The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 7-43.Economic Development Quarterly
150Freshman SK (2006) Principles of Real Estate Syndication. 3rd edn. Los Angeles, CA: Straightline.Planning Theory
151Friedhoff, A., Wial, H., & Wolman, H. (2010, December). The consequences of metropolitan manufacturing decline: Testing conventional wisdom. Washington, DC: Brookings.Economic Development Quarterly
152Friedmann J (1987) Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Planning Theory
153Friedmann J (2000) Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning. In: Campbell J and Fainstein S (ed.) Readings in Planning Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 75–80.Planning Theory
154Frug GE (1979) The city as a legal concept. Harvard Law Review 93: 1057–1154.Planning Theory
155Gál F and Fric P (1987) Problem-oriented participative forecasting. Futures 19(6): 678–685.Planning Theory
156Galland D and Hansen CJ (2012) The roles of planning in waterfront redevelopment: From planled and market-driven styles to hybrid planning?. Planning Practice and Research 27(2): 203–225.Planning Theory
157Galster G (1997) Comparing demand-side and supply-side housing policies: Sub-market and spatial perspectives. Housing Studies 12(4): 561–577.Planning Theory
158Garcia-López, M.-À. (2010). Population suburbanization in Barcelona, 1991–2005: Is its spatial structure changing? Journal of Housing Economics, 19, 119-132.Economic Development Quarterly
159Gehl J (1987) Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Planning Theory
160Genis S (2007) Producing elite localities: The rise of gated communities in Istanbul. Urban Studies 44(4): 771–798.Planning Theory
161Gibson-Wood H and Wakefield S (2013) ‘Participation’, white privilege and environmental justice: Understanding environmentalism among Hispanics in Toronto. Antipode 45(3): 641– 662.Planning Theory
162Giddens A (1999) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell.Planning Theory
163Gieryn T (2000) A space for place in sociology. Annual Sociological Review 26: 463–496.Planning Theory
164Gilbert N (2008) (ed.) Researching Social Life. London: SAGE.Planning Theory
165Gilmartin M, Learmouth D, Swales JK, et al. (2013) Regional policy spillovers: The national impact of demand-side policy in an interregional model of the UK economy. Environment and Planning A 45(4): 814–834.Planning Theory
166Glaeser, E. L., Kahn, M. E., & Rappaport, J. (2008). Why do the poor live in cities? The role of public transportation. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(1), 1-24.Economic Development Quarterly
167Glasze G, Webster C and Frantz K (eds) (2006) Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives. London: Routledge.Planning Theory
168Glenn MR (2005) Brownfields Capital—Unlocking value in environmental redevelopment. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management 11(1): 81–92.Planning Theory
169Goldin I and Vogel T (2010) Global governance and systemic risk in the 21st century: Lessons from the financial crisis. Global Policy 1(1): 4–15.Planning Theory
170Goonewardena K (2003) The future of planning at the ‘end of history’. Planning Theory 2(3): 183–224.Planning Theory
171Gordon DLA (1996) Planning, design and managing change in urban waterfront redevelopment. Town Planning Review 67(3): 261–290.Planning Theory
172Gordon DLA (1997) Financing urban waterfront redevelopment. Journal of the American Planning Association 63(2): 244–265.Planning Theory
173Gordon P (2012) Spontaneous cities. In: Andersson DE (ed.) The Spatial Market Process. Bingley: Emerald, 181–209.Planning Theory
174Graham S and Healey P (1999) Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies 7(5): 623–646.Planning Theory
175Graham, M. R., Kutzbach, M. J., & McKenzie, B. (2014). Design comparison of LODES and ACS commuting data products. Retrieved from http://www2.census.gov/ces/wp/2014/ CES-WP-14-38.pdfEconomic Development Quarterly
176Gramsci A (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers. Green-Pedersen C and Van Kersbergen K (2002) The politics of the ‘Third Way’. The transformation of social democracy in Denmark and the Netherlands. Party Politics 8(5): 507–524.Planning Theory
177Gualini E and Majoor S (2007) Innovative practices in large urban development projects: Conflicting frames in the quest for “new urbanity.” Planning Theory & Practice 8(3): 297– 318.Planning Theory
178Guignon CB (1991) Pragmatism or hermeneutics? Epistemology after foundationalism. In: Hiley DR, Bohman J and Shusterman R (eds) The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. New York: Cornell University Press, 81–102.Planning Theory
179Gunder M (2006) Sustainability: Planning’s saving grace or road to perdition. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26(2): 208–221.Planning Theory
180Gunder M (2010) Fake it until you make it, and then … Planning Theory 10(3): 201–212.Planning Theory
181Gunder M (2010) Planning as the ideology of (neoliberal) space. Planning Theory 9(4): 298–314.Planning Theory
182Habermas J (1962) Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Planning Theory
183Habermas J (1985) Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Planning Theory
184Habermas J (1994) Human rights and popular sovereignty: The liberal and republican versions. Ratio Juris 7(1): 1–13.Planning Theory
185Hackworth J (2007) The Neoliberal City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Planning Theory
186Hajer M (1997) Heterotopia’s. Overstappen als cultuurpolitieke visie op de ruimtelijke inrichting. In: Hajer M and Halsema F (eds) Land in zicht! Een cultuurpolitieke uitdaging. Amsterdam: Wiarda Beckman Stichting/Uitgeverij Bert Bakker, 66–80.Planning Theory
187Hajer M and Reijndorp A (2001) In Search of New Public Domain. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.Planning Theory
188Haken H (1988) Information and Self-Organization. Berlin: Springer.Planning Theory
189Hamers D and Tennekes J (2008) Voor een beperkt publiek. De effecten van besloten wooncomplexen op het publieke domein in Nederland. Krisis: Tijdschrift voor actuele filosofie (2): 18–36.Planning Theory
190Hamers D and Van Middelkoop M (2012) Herkenbaar, overzichtelijk en geborgen. Een verkenning van de maatschappelijke achtergronden van afgeschermde woondomeinen in Nederland. Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit 2(1): 11–28.Planning Theory
191Hamers D, Nabielek K, Schluchter S, et al. M (2007) Afgeschermde woondomeinen in Nederland. Rotterdam and The Hague: NAi Publishers and Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research.Planning Theory
192Hanson ME (1986) Modeling for forecasting versus modeling for understanding. Journal of Planning Education and Research 6(1): 50–59.Planning Theory
193Harding A (1997) Urban regimes in a Europe of the cities? European Urban and Regional Studies 4(4): 291–314.Planning Theory
194Harkavy, I. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1999). Eds and Meds: Cities’ hidden assets. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/~/ media/research/files/reports/1999/9/community-developmentharkavy- zuckerman/09_community_development_report.pdfEconomic Development Quarterly
195Harrison, B., & Glasmeler, A. K. (1997). Response: Why business alone won’t redevelop the inner city: A friendly critique of Michael Porter’s approach to urban revitalization. Economic Development Quarterly, 11, 28-38. doi:10.1177/089124249701100103Economic Development Quarterly
196Hartley, D., Kaza, N., & Lester, T. W. (2016). Are America’s Inner Cities Competitive? Evidence from the 2000s. Economic Development Quarterly, 30(2), 137–158.Economic Development Quarterly
197Harvey D (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hodge GA, Greve C and Boardman A (eds) (2010) International Handbook on Public Private Partnerships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Planning Theory
198Hayek FA (1967) Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. London: Routledge.Planning Theory
199Hayek FA (1978) New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. London: Routledge.Planning Theory
200Healey P (2007) Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times. New York: Taylor & Francis.Planning Theory
201Healey P (2009) The pragmatic tradition in planning thought. Journal of Planning Education and Research 28(3): 277–292.Planning Theory
202Hellinga H (2005) Onrust in park en stad. Stedelijke vernieuwing in de Amsterdamse Westelijke Tuinsteden. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Planning Theory
203Hempel CG (1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press.Planning Theory
204Hill, E. W., Wolman, H. L., & Ford, C. C. (1995). Can suburbs survive without their central cities? Examining the suburban dependence hypothesis. Urban Affairs Review, 31, 147-174. Hutton, T. A. (2004). The new economy of the inner city. Cities, 21, 89-108.Economic Development Quarterly
205Hilliard, T. (2013). Building the American workforce (Renewing America; A CFR Working Paper). New York, NY: Council on Foreign Relations.Economic Development Quarterly
206Hillier J (2003) Agonizing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be “Real.” Planning Theory 2(1): 37–59.Planning Theory
207Hillier J (2011) Strategic navigation across multiple planes: Towards a Deleuzean-inspired methodology for strategic spatial planning. Town Planning Review 82(5): 503–527.Planning Theory
208Hillier J (2012) Baroque complexity. In: De Roo G, Hillier J and Van Wezemael J (eds) Complexity and Planning: Systems. Farnham: Ashgate, 37–73.Planning Theory
209Hoch C (1994) What Planners Do. Chicago, IL: Planners Press.Planning Theory
210Hoch C (2009) Planning craft: How planners compose plans. Planning Theory 8(3): 219–241.Planning Theory
211Hokken S (2004) Segregatie werkt. In: Loderichs M (ed.) De stad vernieuwt. 25 visies op stedelijke vernieuwing. Amersfoort: DHV Ruimte en Mobiliteit.Planning Theory
212Holcombe GE (2013) Planning and the invisible hand: Allies or adversaries? Planning Theory 12(2): 199–210.Planning Theory
213Holcombe RG (2013) Planning and the invisible hand: Allies or adversaries? Planning Theory 12(2): 199–210.Planning Theory
214Holland JH (1995) Hidden Order. New York: Basic Books.Planning Theory
215Hollis M (1994) The Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Planning Theory
216Hopkins, E. M., & Ferris, J. (Eds.). (2015). Place-based initiatives in the context of public policy and markets: Moving to higher ground. Los Angeles: Center on Philanthropy and Public Policy, University of Southern California.Economic Development Quarterly
217Howell O (2008) Urban governance, recreation space, and the cultivation of personal responsibility. Space and Culture 11(4): 475–496.Planning Theory
218Howlett M (2005) What is a policy instrument? Tools, mixes, and implementation styles. In: Eliadis P, Hill MM and Howlett M (eds) Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance. Montreal, QC, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 31–50.Planning Theory
219Huxley M (2000) The limits to communicative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19(4): 369–377.Planning Theory
220Ihlanfeldt K (2004) Introduction: Exclusionary land-use regulations. Urban Studies 41(2): 255–259.Planning Theory
221Ihlanfeldt, K., & Sjoquist, D. (1989). The impact of job decentralization on the economic welfare of central-city blacks. Journal of Urban Economics, 26, 110-130. Kain, J. (1968). Housing segregation: Negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82, 175-197.Economic Development Quarterly
222Ikeda S (2004) Urban interventionism and local knowledge. Review of Austrian Economics 17(2– 3): 247–264.Planning Theory
223Initiative for a Competitive Inner City, & CEOs for Cities. (2002). Leveraging colleges and universities for urban economic revitalization: An action agenda. Boston, MA: Author.Economic Development Quarterly
224Initiative for a Competitive Inner City. (2010). The Inner City 100: A ten-year perspective. Boston, MA: Author.Economic Development Quarterly
225Initiative for a Competitive Inner City. (2011, January). Inner City insights: Vol. 1, Iss. 1. The promise of local clusters. Boston, MA: Author.Economic Development Quarterly
226Initiative for a Competitive Inner City. (2014a, July). The missing link: Clusters, small business growth and vibrant urban economies.Economic Development Quarterly
227Initiative for a Competitive Inner City. (2014b). A roadmap for inner city business data collection. Boston, MA: Author.Economic Development Quarterly
228Innes JE and Booher D (1999) Consensus building and complex adaptive systems. Journal of the American Planning Association 65(4): 412–423.Planning Theory
229Innes JE and Booher D (2010) Planning with Complexity. London: Routledge.Planning Theory
230Innes JE and Booher DE (2010) Planning with Complexity. London: Routledge.Planning Theory
231Interise. (2015). The Interise 2014 impact report. Boston, MA: Author.Economic Development Quarterly
232Jacobs J (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.Planning Theory
233Jacobs J (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.Planning Theory
234Janssen-Jansen LB (2012) The Dutch office space tragedy: Unlocking the lock-in. In: Hartmann T and Needham B (eds) Planning by Law and Property Rights Reconsidered. Farnham: Ashgate, 189–205.Planning Theory
235Jenks M, Burton E and Williams K (eds) (1996) The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? London: Routledge.Planning Theory
236Jessop A (1973) The form and use of housing models. Journal of the Royal Town Planning Institute 59(2): 78–81.Planning Theory
237Jessop B (2002) Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state-theoretical perspective. Antipode 34(3): 452–472.Planning Theory
238Johnson J (2012) Cities: Systems of systems of systems. In: Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, et al. (eds) Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age. Berlin: Springer, 153–172.Planning Theory
239Jones C (1996) The theory of property-led local economic development policies. Regional Studies 30(8): 797–801.Planning Theory
240Kaiser EJ, Godschalk DR and Chapin FS (1995) Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Planning Theory
241Kasarda, J. D. (1993). Inner-city concentrated poverty and neighborhood distress: 1970 to 1990. Housing Policy Debate, 4, 253-302.Economic Development Quarterly
242Katz, M. B. (1993). The “underclass” debate: Views from history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Economic Development Quarterly
243Kilpatrick HE (2001) Complexity, spontaneous order and Friedrich Hayek. Complexity 6(3): 16–20.Planning Theory
244Kirkpatrick LO and Smith MP (2011) The infrastructural limits to growth: Rethinking the urban growth machine in times of fiscal crisis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35(3): 477–503.Planning Theory
245Kneebone, E., & Berube, A. (2013). Confronting suburban poverty in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Economic Development Quarterly
246Kneebone, E., Nadeau, C., & Berube, A. (2011, November). The reemergency of concentrated poverty: Metropolitan trends in the 2000s. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Economic Development Quarterly
247Koppl RG (1996) It is high time we take our ignorance more seriously. International Review of Financial Analysis 5(3): 259–272.Planning Theory
248Kramer F (2006) Gesloten gemeenschappen in navolging van Amerika en Zuid-Afrika. Algemeen Dagblad, 22 April, 4.Planning Theory
249Kuisma M and Ryner M (2012) ‘Third Way’ decomposition and the rightward shift in Finnish and Swedish politics. Contemporary Politics 18(3): 325–342.Planning Theory
250Laclau E and Mouffe C (2001) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. 2nd edn. London: Verso.Planning Theory
251Lai L (1994) The economics of land use zoning. A literature review and analysis of the work of Coase. Town Planning Review 65(1): 77–98.Planning Theory
252Landman K (2006) Who owns the roads? Privatising public space in South African cities through neighbourhood closures. GeoJournal 66: 133–146.Planning Theory
253Lane J-E (2000) New Public Management. London: Routledge.Planning Theory
254Langlois RN (1986) Coherence and flexibility. In: Kirzner IM (ed.) Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding. London: Macmillan, 171–191.Planning Theory
255Lawrence PR and Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 12(1): 1–47.Planning Theory
256Lawson T (1997) Economics and Reality. London: Routledge.Planning Theory
257Le Goix R (2005) Gated communities: Sprawl and social segregation in southern California. Housing Studies 20(2): 323–344.Planning Theory
258Ledebur, L. C., & Barnes, W. R. (1993). “All in it together”: Cities, suburbs, and local economic regions (Research report on America’s cities). Washington, DC: National League of Cities.Economic Development Quarterly
259Lefebvre H (1991) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.Planning Theory
260Lehrer U and Laidley J (2008) Old mega-projects newly packaged? Waterfront redevelopment in Toronto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32(4): 786–803.Planning Theory
261Leitner H, Sheppard ES, Sziarto K, et al. (2007) Contesting urban futures: Decentering neoliberalism. In: Leitner H, Peck J and Sheppard ES (eds) Contesting Neoliberalism: Urban Frontiers. London: Guilford Press, pp. 1–25.Planning Theory
262Leknes E, Farsund AA and Holmen AKT (2005) Kommuneplan som styringsredskap i norske storbyer (Report RF-2005/191). Stavanger: Rogalandsforskning.Planning Theory
263Lester, T. W., & Hartley, D. A. (2014). The long term employment impacts of gentrification in the 1990s. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 45, 80-89. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco. 2014.01.003Economic Development Quarterly
264Lewis MW (2000) Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review 25(4): 760–776.Planning Theory
265Ley, D. (1996). The new middle class and the remaking of the central city. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Economic Development Quarterly
266Lindblom CE (1959) The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review 19(2): 79–88.Planning Theory
267Lloyd, R., & Clark, T. N. (2001). The city as an entertainment machine. In K. Fox Gotham (Ed.), Critical perspectives on urban redevelopment (pp. 357-378). Bingley, England: Emerald.Economic Development Quarterly
268Lofland L (1998) The Public Realm: Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Territory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Planning Theory
269Lohof S and Reijndorp A (2006) Privé terrein. Privaat beheerde woondomeinen in Nederland. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.Planning Theory
270Long JA (2012) Overcoming neoliberal hegemony in community development: Law, planning, and selected Lamarckism. Urban Lawyer 44(2): 345–398.Planning Theory
271Low S (2003) Behind the Gates: Life, Security and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. New York and London: Routledge.Planning Theory
272Low S and Smith N (eds) (2006) The Politics of Public Space. New York: Routledge. McKenzie E (1994) Privatopia: Homeowner Associations and the Rise of Residential Private Government. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.Planning Theory
273Mann RB (1988) Ten trends in the continuing renaissance of urban waterfronts. Landscape and Urban Planning 16(1–2): 177–199.Planning Theory
274Mäntysalo R (2002) Dilemmas in critical planning theory. Town Planning Review 73(4): 417– 436.Planning Theory
275Mäntysalo R and Saglie I-L (2010) Private influence preceding public involvement: Strategies for legitimizing preliminary partnership arrangements in urban housing planning in Norway and Finland. Planning Theory and Practice 11(3): 317–338.Planning Theory
276Manzi T and Smith-Bowers B (2005) Gated communities as club goods: Segregation or social cohesion? Housing Studies 20(2): 345–359.Planning Theory
277Marcuse, P. (1985). Gentrification, abandonment, and displacement: Connections, causes, and policy responses in New York City. Retrieved from http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1396&context=law_urbanlawEconomic Development Quarterly
278Marshall S (2012) Planning, design and the complexity of cities. In: Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, et al. (eds) Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age. Berlin: Springer, 191–205.Planning Theory
279Marwedel J (1998) Opting for performance: An alternative to conventional zoning for land use regulation. Journal of Planning Literature 13(2): 220–231.Planning Theory
280Mazza L (2002) Technical knowledge and planning actions. Planning Theory 1(1): 11–26.Planning Theory
281McCloskey DN (1994) The persuasive life. Reason 26: 67–70.Planning Theory
282McGuirk PM (2005) Neoliberalist planning? Re-thinking and re-casting Sydney’s metropolitan planning. Geographical Research 43(1): 59–70.Planning Theory
283McKenzie E (2005) Planning through residential clubs: Homeowners’ associations. Economic Affairs 25(4): 28–31.Planning Theory
284McLaughlin RB (2012) Land use regulation: Where have we been, where are we going? Cities 29: S50–S55.Planning Theory
285McLoughlin JB (1969) Urban and Regional Planning. London: Faber and Faber.Planning Theory
286McMillen, D. P. (2001). Nonparametric employment subcenter identification. Journal of Urban Economics, 50, 448-473.Economic Development Quarterly
287McMillen, D. P. (2003). Identifying sub-centres using contiguity matrices. Urban Studies, 40, 57-69. Meltzer, R., & Schuetz, J. (2012). Bodegas or Bagel shops? Neighborhood differences in retail and household services. Economic Development Quarterly, 26, 73-94. doi:10.1177/0891242411430328Economic Development Quarterly
288Meijering L, Van Hoven B and Huijgen P (2005) Leefgemeenschappen, publiek en privaat. Rooilijn 38(3): 128–135.Planning Theory
289Miara, J. (2007, January). Retail in inner cities. Urban Land Institute Magazine, 98-105.Economic Development Quarterly
290Mohai P, Pellow D and Roberts JT (2009) Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34: 405–430.Planning Theory
291Montgomery MR (2000) Complexity theory. An Austrian perspective. In: Colander D (ed.) Complexity and the History of Economic Thought. London: Routledge, 227–240.Planning Theory
292Moore A (1975) Transferable development rights: An idea whose time has come. In: Rose JG (ed.) The Transfer of Development Rights. New Brunswick, NJ: CUPR Press, 221–232.Planning Theory
293Moretti, E. (2012). The new geography of jobs. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Economic Development Quarterly
294Morgan G (1997) Images of Organization. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Planning Theory
295Moroni S (2007) Planning, liberty and the rule of law. Planning Theory 6(2): 146–163.Planning Theory
296Moroni S (2009) Complexity, knowledge, and regulation. In: Rabino G and Caglioni M (eds) Planning, Complexity and New ICT. Firenze: Alinea, 177–184.Planning Theory
297Moroni S (2010) Rethinking the theory and practice of land-use regulation. Towards nomocracy. Planning Theory 9(2): 137–155.Planning Theory
298Moroni S (2010) Rethinking the theory and practice of land-use regulation: Towards nomocracy. Planning Theory 9(2): 137–155.Planning Theory
299Moroni S (2011a) The role of deliberate intervention on organizations and institutions. Planning Theory 10(2): 190–197.Planning Theory
300Moroni S (2011b) Land-use regulation for the creative city. In: Andersson DE, Mellander C and Andersson A (eds) Handbook of Creative Cities. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 343–364.Planning Theory
301Moroni S (2012a) Why nomocracy: Structural ignorance, radical pluralism and the role of relational rules. Progress in Planning 77(2): 46–59.Planning Theory
302Moroni S (2012b) Land-use planning and the question of unintended consequences. In: Andersson DE (ed.) The Spatial Market Process. Bingley: Emerald, 265–288.Planning Theory
303Moroni S (2012c) Afterword: Ethical problems of contemporary cities. In: Basta C and Moroni S (eds) Ethics, Design and Planning of the Built Environment. Berlin: Springer, 197–212.Planning Theory
304Moroni S (2013) La città responsabile. Roma: Carocci.Planning Theory
305Murphy L (2008) Third-wave gentrification in New Zealand: The case of Auckland. Urban Studies 45(12): 2521–2540.Planning Theory
306Nelson AC, Pruetz R, Woodruff D, et al. (2012) The TDR Handbook. Washington, DC: Island Press.Planning Theory
307Nelson R (2005) Private Neighborhoods and the Transformation of Local Government. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Planning Theory
308Newark Alliance. (2006, April). Opportunity Newark: Jobs and community development for the 21st century. Newark, NJ: Author.Economic Development Quarterly
309Newman O (1972) Defensible Space: Crime Prevention through Urban Design. New York: MacMillan.Planning Theory
310Nio I (2004) Op zoek naar nieuwe collectiviteit. In: Van Bolhuis P, Bijhouwer R, Cusveller S, et al. (eds) Jaarboek Landschapsarchitectuur en Stedenbouw in Nederland 01–03. Bussum: Toth.Planning Theory
311Nordstrom C (1997) A Different Kind of War Story. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Planning Theory
312Norris, T., & Howard, T. (2015). Can hospitals heal America’s communities? Washington, DC: Democracy Collaborative.Economic Development Quarterly
313O’Callaghan C and Linehan D (2007) Identity, politics and conflict in dockland development in Cork, Ireland: European Capital of Culture 2005. Cities 24(4): 311–323.Planning Theory
314O’Driscoll GP and Rizzo MJ (1985) The Economics of Time and Ignorance. London: Routledge.Planning Theory
315Oakley S (2011) Re-imagining city waterfronts: A comparative analysis of governing renewal in Adelaide, Darwin and Melbourne. Urban Policy and Research 29(3): 221–238.Planning Theory
316OECD (2001) Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy Making. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Planning Theory
317Oosterlynck S, Albrechts L and Moulaert F (2011) Strategic Spatial Projects: Catalysts for Change. Abingdon: Routledge.Planning Theory
318Ottensmann JR (2005) Planning through the exchange of rights under performance zoning. Economic Affairs 25(4): 40–43.Planning Theory
319Oude Ophuis R (2000) Collectief beheerde woonparken. Betrokkenheid en controle in een private woonomgeving. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Planning Theory
320Overbeek H and Van der Pijl K (1993) Restructuring capital and restructuring hegemony: Neoliberalism and the unmaking of the post-war order. In: Overbeek H (ed.) Restructuring Hegemony in the Global Political Economy: The Rise of Transnational Neo-liberalism in the 1980s. London: Routledge, 1–27.Planning Theory
321Owen, A., & Levinson, D. M. (2015). Modeling the commute mode share of transit using continuous accessibility to jobs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74, 110-122.Economic Development Quarterly
322Pack, J. R. (2002). Growth and convergence in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Economic Development Quarterly
323Parnell S and Robinson J (2012) (Re)theorizing cities from the global south: Looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography 33(4): 593–617.Planning Theory
324Pastor, M., Lester, T. W., & Scoggins, J. (2009). Why regions? Why now? Who cares? Journal of Urban Affairs, 31, 269-296. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00460.xEconomic Development Quarterly
325Pastor, M., Lopez-Garza, M., & Drier, P. (2000). Regions that work: How cities and suburbs can grow together. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Economic Development Quarterly
326Pastor, M., Scoggins, J., Lester, T. W., & Chapple, K. (2009). Building Resilient Regions Database [Machine-readable database]. Chicago, IL: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.Economic Development Quarterly
327Peck J and Tickell A (2002) Neoliberalizing space. In: Brenner N and Theodore N (eds) Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 33–57.Planning Theory
328Peck J, Theodore N and Brenner N (2009) Neoliberal urbanism: Models, moments, mutations. SAIS Review 29(1): 49–66.Planning Theory
329Peet R (2002) Ideology, discourse, and the geography of hegemony: From socialist to neoliberal development in postapartheid South Africa. Antipode 34(1): 54–84.Planning Theory
330Perkins HA (2013) Consent to neoliberal hegemony through coercive urban environmental governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37(1): 311–327.Planning Theory
331Perloff HF (1980) Planning the Post-Industrial City. Chicago, IL: Planners Press.Planning Theory
332Pérouse J-F (2003) The hidden emergence of secured housing complexes in Turkey. A case study of the Beykoz district (Istanbul). Geographica Helvetica 58(4): 340–350.Planning Theory
333Pesch U (2003) Exploring the public/private dichotomy: An evaluation of “The intellectual crisis of American public administration” and “The government is us.” In: Rutgers MR (ed.) Retracing Public Administration. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 37–75.Planning Theory
334Polanyi M (1998) The Logic of Liberty. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Planning Theory
335Ponzini D and Nastasi M (2011) Starchitecture: Scenes, Actors and Spectacles in Contemporary Cities. Turin: Umberto Allemandi & Co.Planning Theory
336Poole SP, Van de and Ven AH (1989) Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review 14(4): 562–578.Planning Theory
337Popper KR (1934) Logik der Forschung. Wien: Springer.Planning Theory
338Popper KR (1972) Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Planning Theory
339Popper KR (1978) Natural selection and the emergence of mind. Dialectica 32(3–4): 339–355.Planning Theory
340Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York, NY: Free Press.Economic Development Quarterly
341Porter, M. E. (1997). New strategies for inner-city economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 11(1), 11-27.Economic Development Quarterly
342Porter, M. E. (1997). New strategies for inner-city economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 11, 11-27.Economic Development Quarterly
343Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77-90.Economic Development Quarterly
344Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15-34.Economic Development Quarterly
345Porter, M. E. (2003). The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies, 37, 549-578.Economic Development Quarterly
346Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.Economic Development Quarterly
347Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1992). Gaining the upper hand: Economic mobility among immigrant and domestic minorities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 15, 491-522.Economic Development Quarterly
348Portugali J (1999) Self-Organization and the City. Berlin: Springer.Planning Theory
349Portugali J (2008) Learning from paradoxes about prediction and planning in self-organizing cities. Planning Theory 7(3): 248–262.Planning Theory
350Portugali J (2008) Learning from paradoxes about prediction and planning in self-organizing cities. Planning Theory 7(3): 248–262.Planning Theory
351Portugali J (2012a) Complexity theories of cities: Achievements, criticism and potentials. In: Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, et al. (eds) Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age. Berlin: Springer, 47–62.Planning Theory
352Portugali J (2012b) Complexity theories of cities: Implications to urban planning. In: Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, et al. (eds) Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age. Berlin: Springer, 221–224.Planning Theory
353Portugali J (2012c) Complexity theories of cities: First, second or third culture of planning? In: De Roo G, Hillier J and Van Wezemael J (eds) Complexity and Planning. Farnham: Ashgate, 117–140.Planning Theory
354Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, et al. (eds) (2012) Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age. Berlin: Springer.Planning Theory
355Purcell M (2008) Recapturing Democracy: Neoliberalization and the Struggle for Alternative Urban Futures. London: Routledge.Planning Theory
356Purcell M (2009) Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? Planning Theory 8(2): 140–165.Planning Theory
357Raco M (2005) Sustainable development, rolled-out neo-liberalism and sustainable communities. Antipode 37(2): 324–347.Planning Theory
358Raco M (2012) Neoliberal urban policy, aspirational citizenship and the uses of cultural distinction. In: Tasan-Kok T and Baeten G (eds) Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning. Berlin: Springer, 43–60.Planning Theory
359Raco M and Street E (2012) Resilience planning, economic change and the politics of postrecession development in London and Hong Kong. Urban Studies 49(5): 1065–1087.Planning Theory
360Raposo R (2003) New landscapes: Gated housing estates in the Lisbon metropolitan area. Geographica Helvetica 58(4): 293–301.Planning Theory
361Regulski J (1981) La pianificazione della città. Roma: Officina.Planning Theory
362Reijndorp A (2004) Stadswijk. Stedenbouw en dagelijks leven. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.Planning Theory
363Reijndorp A (2007) Kruidvatwijken. In: Derksen W (ed.) Kijkend naar Nederland Rotterdam; The Hague: NAi Publishers and Ruimtelijk Planbureau, 53–62.Planning Theory
364Rittel H and Webber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.Planning Theory
365Rivkin, J., Mills, K. G., & Porter, M. E. (2015, September). The challenge of shared prosperity: Findings of Harvard Business School’s 2015 Survey on U.S. Competitiveness (M. I. Norton & M. B. Weiss, Contributors). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.Economic Development Quarterly
366Rodin, J. (2007). The university & urban revival: Out of the ivory tower and into the streets. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Economic Development Quarterly
367Rosen G and Razin E (2009) The rise of gated communities in Israel: Reflections on changing urban governance in a neo-liberal era. Urban Studies 46(8): 1702–1722.Planning Theory
368Rutland T (2010) The financialization of urban redevelopment. Geography Compass 4(8): 1167– 1178.Planning Theory
369Saad-Filho A and Johnston D (eds) (2005) Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader. London: Pluto Press.Planning Theory
370Sabatier B (2005) Les résidences fermées à Toulouse. Une offre immobilière construisant la ville privée. Espaces et sociétés 123: 131–149.Planning Theory
371Sagalyn LB (1997) Negotiating for public benefits: The bargaining calculus of public-private development. Urban Studies 34(12): 1955–1970.Planning Theory
372Sager T (2011) Neo-liberal urban planning policies: A literature survey 1990–2010. Progress in Planning 76(4): 147–199.Planning Theory
373Sager T (2013) Reviving Critical Planning Theory. London: Routledge.Planning Theory
374Salet W, Bertolini L and Giezen M (2012) Complexity and uncertainty: Problem or asset in decision making of mega infrastructure projects? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Epub ahead of print 2 March. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01133.x.Planning Theory
375Sampson, R. J. (2008). Rethinking crime and immigration. Contexts, 7(1), 28-33.Economic Development Quarterly
376Sard, B., & Fischer, W. (2008). Preserving safe, high quality public housing should be a priority of federal housing policy. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.Economic Development Quarterly
377Savini F (2012) The governability of national spatial planning: Light instruments and logics of governmental action in strategic urban development. Urban Studies 50(8): 1592– 1607.Planning Theory
378Savini F (2013) Political dilemmas in peripheral development: Investment, regulation, and interventions in metropolitan Amsterdam. Planning Theory & Practice 14(3): 333–348.Planning Theory
379Savini F (2014) What happens to the periphery? The political tensions of postindustrial redevelopment in Milan. Urban Affairs Review. 50(2): 180–205.Planning Theory
380Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Economic Development Quarterly
381Scharenberg A and Bader I (2009) Berlin’s waterfront site struggle. City 13(2–3): 325–335.Planning Theory
382Schleith, D., & Horner, M. (2014). Commuting, job clusters, and travel burdens: Analysis of spatially and socioeconomically disaggregated longitudinal employer-household dynamics data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2452, 19-27.Economic Development Quarterly
383Scott A, Agnew J, Soja E, et al. (2002) Global city-regions. In: Scott A (ed.) Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 11–30.Planning Theory
384Scott JS (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Planning Theory
385Sennett R (1970) The Uses of Disorder: Personal Identity and City Life. New York: Vintage Books.Planning Theory
386Sennett R (1977) The Fall of Public Man. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Planning Theory
387Sennett R (1991) The Conscience of the Eye: The Design and Social Life of Cities. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Planning Theory
388Shatkin G (2008) The city and the bottom line: Urban megaprojects and the privatization of planning in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning A 40(2): 383–401.Planning Theory
389Sitter N (2006) Norway’s Storting election of September 2005: Back to the left? West European Politics 29(3): 573–580.Planning Theory
390Smith V (2008) Rationality in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Planning Theory
391Smith WK and Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review 36(2): 381–403.Planning Theory
392Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. London, England: Routledge.Economic Development Quarterly
393Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 34, 427-450. doi:10.1111/1467- 833000249Economic Development Quarterly
394Sohmer, R. R., & Lang, R. E. (2001). Downtown rebound. In B. Katz & R. E. Lang (Eds.), Redefining urban and suburban America: Evidence from census 2000 (Vol. 1, pp. 63-74). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Economic Development Quarterly
395Sorensen D and Day R (1981) Libertarian planning. Town Planning Review 52(4): 390–402.Planning Theory
396Sorkin M (1992) Introduction. In: Sorkin M (ed.) Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space. New York: Hill & Wang, xi–xv.Planning Theory
397Special Committee of the California Legislature. (1992). To rebuild is not enough: Final report and recommendations of the Assembly Special Committee on the Los Angeles Crisis. Sacramento, CA: Assembly Publications Office.Economic Development Quarterly
398Stone CN (1993) Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs 15(1): 1–28.Planning Theory
399Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York, NY: Guilford.Economic Development Quarterly
400Stoyanov P and Frantz K (2006) Gated communities in Bulgaria: Interpreting a new trend in postcommunist urban development. GeoJournal 66(1): 57–63.Planning Theory
401Strogatz S (2003) Sync. New York: Hyperion Books.Planning Theory
402Suárez, M., & Delgado, J. (2009). Is Mexico City polycentric? A trip attraction capacity approach. Urban Studies, 46, 2187-2211.Economic Development Quarterly
403Swyngedouw E, Moulaert F and Rodriguez A (2002) Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: Large–scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode 34(3): 542– 577.Planning Theory
404Swyngedouw E, Moulart F and Rodriguez A (2002) Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: Largescale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode 34(3): 542–577.Planning Theory
405Talen E (2012) City Rules. Washington, DC: Island Press.Planning Theory
406Tasan-Kok T (2008) Changing interpretations of ‘flexibility’ in the planning literature: From opportunism to creativity? International Planning Studies 13(3): 183–195.Planning Theory
407Tasan-Kok T and Baeten G (eds) (2012) Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning. Berlin: Springer.Planning Theory
408Teitz, M., & Chapple, K. (1998). The causes of inner-city poverty: Eight hypotheses in search of reality. Citiscape, 3(3), 33-70.Economic Development Quarterly
409The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2014). 25th Edition: 2014 KIDS COUNT data book: State trends in child well-being. Baltimore, MD: Author.Economic Development Quarterly
410The Economist. (2015, May 2). Shredding the rules. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/business/21650142-strikingnumber- innovative-companies-have-business-models-floutlaw- shreddingEconomic Development Quarterly
411The Pew Charitable Trusts. (2012, October). Weathering the great recession: Did high-poverty neighborhoods fare worse? Philadelphia, PA: Author.Economic Development Quarterly
412Thompson JB (1984) Studies in the Theory of Ideology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Planning Theory
413Thorsnes P and Simons GPW (1999) Letting the market preserve land: The case for a market- driven transfer of development rights program. Contemporary Economic Policy 17(2): 256–266.Planning Theory
414Thrift N (2000) Not a straight line but a curve, or, cities are not mirrors of modernity. In: Bell D and Haddour A (eds) City Visions. London: Longman, 233–263.Planning Theory
415Thurbon E (2012) Ideas and industrial governance: Has the influence of neoliberalism been overstated? In: Cahill D, Edwards L and Stilwell F (eds) Neoliberalism: Beyond the Free Market. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 180–203.Planning Theory
416Tiebout C (1956) A pure theory of local expenditure. Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–424.Planning Theory
417Tisma A, Bijlsma L and Dammer E (2007) Private initiatives in housing developments in the Netherlands and the role of directed urban design. In: 43rd ISOCARP congress, Antwerp, Belgium, 19–23 September.Planning Theory
418Tretter EM (2013) Contesting sustainability: ‘SMART growth’ and the redevelopment of Austin’s Eastside. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37(1): 297–310.Planning Theory
419Trondheim kommune (1987) Kommuneplan for Trondheim 1987–1997. Trondheim: Trondheim kommune.Planning Theory
420Trondheim kommune (1995) Møtebok for formannskapet (Minute Book of the Executive Committee of the City Council, meeting of 8 July 1995, issue number FBR 0103/95, the comments of the Director of Urban Conservation). Trondheim: Trondheim kommune.Planning Theory
421Trondheim kommune (2000) Kommuneplanmelding. Strategier for en langsiktig byutvikling i Trondheim fram mot 2030. Trondheim: Byplankontoret.Planning Theory
422Turner C, Carpenter SR, Gustafson EJ, et al. (2012) Land Use. CALI eLangdell Press.Planning Theory
423United Nations (UN) (1987) Our Common Future (Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development). Available at: conspect.nl/pdf/Our_Common_Future- Brundtland_Report_1987.pdf (accessed 26 October 2012).Planning Theory
424United Nations (UN) (1993) Agenda 21. The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio (Earth Summit). New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Planning Theory
425United Nations (UN) (2000) United Nations Millennium Declaration. Available at: http://www. un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.pdf (accessed 27 October 2012).Planning Theory
426Van der Heide M and Majoor SJH (2013) Ambidexterity in de Zuidas. Rooilijn 46(3): 172–181.Planning Theory
427Van der Krabben E and Jacobs HM (2013) Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience. Land Use Policy 30(1): 774–783.Planning Theory
428Van Engelsdorp Gastelaars R (1996) Het verdwijnen van de leefwereld, de opkomst van het woondomein. Collectief ervaren territoriale binding op laag niveau in Nederland. In: Derksen W and Salet W (eds) Bouwen aan het binnenlands Bestuur. The Hague: SDU Publishers, 135– 148.Planning Theory
429Van Engelsdorp Gastelaars R and Hamers D (2006) De nieuwe stad: stedelijke centra als brandpunten van interactie. Rotterdam; The Hague: NAi Publishers and Ruimtelijk Planbureau.Planning Theory
430Van Houten R (2013) Gated communities belemmeren cohesie. VNG Magazine 16: 14–15.Planning Theory
431Van Rijswick M and Salet W (2012) Enabling the contextualization of legal rules in responsive strategies to climate change. Ecology and Society 17(2): 18.Planning Theory
432Van Twist M and Van Velzen G (eds) (2009) Privaat beheerde woondomeinen: een wereld op zich? The Hague; Rotterdam: Berenschot and Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.Planning Theory
433Vesselinov E, Cazessus M and Falk W (2007) Gated communities and spatial inequality. Journal of Urban Affairs 29(2): 109–127.Planning Theory
434Vigdor, J. L. (2002). Does gentrification harm the poor? Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth= 0&type=summary&url=/journals/brookings-wharton_ papers_on_urban_affairs/v2002/2002.1vigdor.htmlEconomic Development Quarterly
435Voith, R. (1992). City and suburban growth: Substitutes or compliments. Retrieved from http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/redir. pf?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.phil.frb.org%2Fresearch-anddata% 2Fpublications%2Fbusiness-review%2F1992%2Fbrso92rv. pdf;h=repec:fip:fedpbr:y:1992:i:sep:p:21-33Economic Development Quarterly
436Voith, R. (1998). Do suburbs need cities? Journal of Regional Science, 38, 445-464.Economic Development Quarterly
437Von der Dunk Th (2011) De sluipende privatisering van de staat. de Volkskrant, 18 August. Available at: http://www.volkskrant.nlPlanning Theory
438Von Hayek F (1967) Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Planning Theory
439Webber MM (1974) Permissive planning. In: Blowers A, Hamnett C and Sarre P (eds) The Future of Cities. London: Hutchinson, 214–236.Planning Theory
440Webster C and Lai LWC (2003) Property Rights, Planning and Markets. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Planning Theory
441Webster Ch (2002) Property rights and the public realm: Gates, green belts, and Gemeinschaft. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 29: 397–412.Planning Theory
442Webster Ch (2003) The nature of the neighbourhood. Urban Studies 40(13): 2591–2612.Planning Theory
443Webster Ch and Lai L (2003) Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Planning Theory
444Wehrhahn R and Raposo R (2006) The rise of gated residential neighbourhoods in Portugal and Spain: Lisbon and Madrid. In: Glasze G, Webster C and Frantz K (eds) Private Cities Global and Local Perspectives. London: Routledge, 170–189.Planning Theory
445Weintraub J (1997) The theory and politics of the public/private distinction. In: Weintraub J and Kumar K (eds) Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1–42.Planning Theory
446Westerberg MH (2004) Nedre Elvehavn, Trondheims nyeste bydel! (Nedre Elvehavn, the newest city district of Trondheim). Byplan 56(6): 242–247.Planning Theory
447Westerink J, Haase D, Bauer A, et al. (2013) Dealing with sustainability trade-offs of the compact city in peri-urban planning across European city regions. European Planning Studies 21(4): 473–497.Planning Theory
448While A, Jonas A and Gibbs D (2004) The environment and the entrepreneurial city: Searching for the urban ‘sustainability fix’ in Manchester and Leeds. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28(3): 549–569.Planning Theory
449Whyte W (1980) The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.Planning Theory
450Wible J (2000) What is complexity? In: Colander D (ed.) Complexity and the History of Economic Thought. London: Routledge, 15–30.Planning Theory
451Wilkinson C (2012) Beyond blueprints? Complexity theory as a prospective influence for metropolitan governance. In: De Roo G, Hillier J and Van Wezemael J (eds) Complexity and Planning. Farnham: Ashgate, 243–268.Planning Theory
452Wilson AG and Bennett RJ (1985) Mathematical Methods in Human Geography and Planning. Chichester: Wiley.Planning Theory
453Wilson D (2004) Toward a contingent urban neoliberalism. Urban Geography 25(8): 771–783.Planning Theory
454Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Economic Development Quarterly
455Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor (1st ed.). New York, NY: Knopf.Economic Development Quarterly
456Wyly, E. K., & Hammel, D. J. (1999). Islands of decay in seas of renewal: Housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 711-771. doi:10.1080/10511482.1 9999521348Economic Development Quarterly
457Youn, H., Strumsky, D., Bettencourt, L., & Lobo, J. (2015). Invention as a combinatorial process: Evidence from US patents. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. doi:0.1098/ rsif.2015.0272.Economic Development Quarterly
458Zeuli, K. (2015). Reconsidering the relevance of the inner city for place-based economic growth. In E. M. Hopkins & J. M. Ferris (Eds.), Place-based initiatives in the context of public policy and markets: Moving to higher ground (pp. 37-39). Los Angeles: Center on Philanthropy and Public Policy, University of Southern California.Economic Development Quarterly
459Zeuli, K., Ferguson, L., & Nijhuis, A. (2014). Creating an anchored local economy in Newark: Recommendations for implementing a comprehensive local procurement strategy. Boston, MA: Initiative for a Competitive Inner City.Economic Development Quarterly
460Zuckerman, D. (2013). Hospitals building healthier communities: Embracing the anchor mission. Washington, DC: Democracy Collaborative.Economic Development Quarterly
461Zukin, S. (1982). Loft living: Culture and capital in urban change. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Economic Development Quarterly

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)